Comparison Of Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Remnant Index And Enamel Damage Using Different Light Source In Debonding Of Orthodontic Brackets

dc.contributor.authorAl-yamani, Helmi Abobakr Qaid
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-31T01:14:59Z
dc.date.available2018-07-31T01:14:59Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractLight-curing orthodontic adhesives require light with sufficient intensity and defined wavelength to initiate polymerization. Insufficient light intensity and wavelength causes incomplete polymerization, which decreases shear bond strength (SBS) and render brackets unable to resist intra-oral forces of occlusion or orthodontic forces. During debonding of orthodontic brackets, adhesive remnants remain on the enamel surface and enamel damage (ED) may occur. This study compared the SBS of brackets when cured with two different light sources, the light-emitting diode (LED) and tungsten-quartz-halogen (TQH), and compare the adhesive remnant index (ARI) and ED after debonding. Enamel surfaces of 104 premolars were cleaned and photographed (T1) with a magnifying loupe 60X Olympus stereomicroscope with digital camera to evaluate enamel surfaces before bonding procedure according to a predetermined scale. The teeth were then etched with Self-Etching Primer and bonded with stainless steel brackets using Transbond Adhesive and divided into two groups. In group I, 52 stainless steel brackets were bonded to enamel with LED for 10 seconds and in group II, 52 stainless steel brackets were bonded to enamel with TQH for 20 seconds according to manufacturer’s instruction. All teeth were then stored in distilled water for one week to simulate oral environment. Before bracket debonding, each group was divided into subgroup A and B. In subgroup A, 26 brackets were removed using Instron machine (Instron) at a cross head speed of 1mm/min in order to measure and compare the SBS. In subgroup B, 26 brackets were removed using conventional pliers. After debonding, all enamel surfaces were re-analyzed. The area of residual resin on the enamel was measured and ARI percentages calculated. Resin remnants after debonding was cleaned with tungsten carbide bur and the enamel surfaces were polished with pumice and rubber cups. These surfaces were re-photographed (T2). The ED scores (T1) before bonding and (T2) after debonding were recorded and compared. Independent t-test and Chi-square test were applied.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6072
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversiti Sains Malaysiaen_US
dc.subjectLight-curing orthodontic adhesives require lighten_US
dc.subjectdefined wavelength to initiate polymerizationen_US
dc.titleComparison Of Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Remnant Index And Enamel Damage Using Different Light Source In Debonding Of Orthodontic Bracketsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: