Publication: Effect of grooves on aerodynamic performance of a low reynolds number propeller
Date
2020-10-01
Authors
Seeni, Aravind Seeni
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
UAVs in the future will be designed for next-generation applications such as
product delivery from source to end-user. These UAVs weigh in the range of 1 to 10
kg and are powered by small-scale propellers that operate in the low Reynolds number
(Re) regime (<100,000). The design of low Re propellers has gained particular
importance in the research community with the development of UAVs. Small-scale
propellers typically have low aerodynamic efficiency. Improvement in aerodynamic
performance and efficiency of these propellers will enhance the endurance and
operational range of UAVs. The desired requirement is a propeller design that can
produce improved thrust and reduced torque. In order to fulfil such an objective, a
novel technique known as the grooved design is studied on a small-scale propeller of
pre-defined geometry. This grooved design is based on passive flow control, a
technique in which the aerodynamic characteristics of a body is enhanced through the
modification of surface geometry. A numerical study is performed on a baseline
Applied Precision Composites 10x7 Slow Flyer propeller to investigate grooved
passive flow control technique on propellers. Computational Fluid Dynamics as a
method to solve Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes equations is used as a tool to
analyse this novel design. A steady, incompressible flow around the propeller is
assumed. The commercial code ANSYS Fluent is selected as the solver. First, 2D
simulations are conducted on NACA 0009 airfoil at very low Re of 20000 to study the
flow characteristics of an airfoil at such low Re. The result showed at such low Re, as the α increases, the turbulence wake contours advanced from trailing edge to leading edge. Secondly, the effect of groove geometry variation is analysed. Grooved cross-sections considered in this study are rectangular in geometry with dimensions 0.1×0.1mm, 0.1×0.2mm, 0.1×0.3 mm,
0.2×0.1mm, 0.2×0.2mm and 0.2×0.3mm and placed at 4 specific locations, 0.09c,
0.17c, 0.32c and 0.42c from leading edge. Finally, the effect of positioning multiple
grooves is investigated in which grooves of dimensions 0.1×0.2 mm, 0.1×0.3mm,
0.2×0.1mm, 0.2×0.2mm and 0.2×0.3mm are placed interchangeably at 0.09c, 0.17c,
0.32c and 0.42c. 53 different single and multi-grooved designs constitute the study in
total. The results of the study showed that for the model with 0.2×0.1mm groove at
0.17c, the efficiency improved marginally over baseline for 11 cases of advance ratios
and decreased for 3 cases of advance ratios. For all other models, the efficiency did
not improve relative to baseline for most and/or all advance ratios.