Frasa Nama Bahasa Malaysia Dan Bahasa Inggeris Di Dalam Teks Terjemahan: Satu Kajian Perbandingan Struktur, Makna Dan Strategi Terjemahan

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2002-07
Authors
Muhammad, Mazura @ Mastura
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
development are still under endless speculations. The precise nature of language is still more in the dark. Hence, contrastive analysis may be one of the tools that will enable us to analyse the features and characteristics of a language ·by highlighting its differences and similarities against another. Thus, this study ultimately endeavours to examine the characteristics of the Noun Phrases of the Malay and the English Language. In the similar vein, it aims to determine the similarities and differences of the Nouns Phrases (N') of both languages within · the theoretical framework of the X- Bar Theory representations as being outlined by Chomsky (1982) in the Government and Binding (GB) Theory. In this. endeavour, all efforts are focused on N' Subjects, N' in Predicates, N' in Passive Sentences and N' in Existential Sentences. This study also heralds the translation strategies of Newmark (1981), Nida (1964) and the SapirWhorf hypothesis to facilitate the analysis the translation strategies utilised by the translators in rendering the texts. This study has chosen the Malay novels of Shahnon Ahmad; Ranjan Sepanjang Jalan (1966) and Rentung (1983) and the translated versions- No Harvest But A Thorn and Rope of Ash, which were translated by Adibah Amin (1972) and Harry Aveling (1979) respectively. Both of Shahnon's novels depict the veracious nature of the farmers' world by providing a sharp and detailed authencity of the struggle and arduousness of this world. Therefore, this has impelled the researcher to consider 1 both novels as the perfect "subject samples" for the study. The results of the study present a significant picture that in the case of rendering traditional Malay· literary texts, aspects of linguistics as well as extra-linguistics, such as aspects of culture, beliefs/thoughts, weltansch.auung, religion are the essential traits of the texts. These traits have to be ·transferred and retained across the target language in order to portray the beauty and the cultural scenario of the source language. On the contrary, for the translators these traits are their main obstacles. Thus, the study indicates that the best solutions are minimising the differences and conveying the· messages closest to the source language. In the perspective of Translation Strategies, the study points out that Adibah Amin relies highly on the Formal Translation while rendering words, phrases and sentences that embody the Malay weltanschauung and religious theology. In contrast, Harry A veling displays the tendencies of opting for the Dynamic Translation and very often slipping into the Purposeful Translation in translating words, phrases and sentences that do not exhibit the Malay weltanschauung and religious theology. !flis study is intended that the findings and information obtained in this study will be applied m future translation works for the development of the sphere and it is hoped that this study would update and validate the Malay Linguistic and Translation domain.
Description
Keywords
Social sciences , Grammar
Citation