Divergence Of Opinion, Representative Heuristics, Disposition Effect And Noise Trading In The Malaysian New Listings Market

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2008-01
Authors
FEN NEE, CHONG
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Similar to those in many other countries, the phenomena of short-run and long-run pricing anomalies of the Malaysian new listings market have been widely documented. Nevertheless, studies which provide insights into the new listing market from the behavioural finance theory perspective that relates to the new listings' aftermarket inefficiency is limited. With an emerging market status and an average of 91.35% of market participants made up of individual investors who are normally not-well-informed, numerous researches have provided evidences on the inefficiency of the Malaysian stock market. Driven by the investors' profile and these evidences, it is the objective of this study to reduce the existing gap by examining the new listing market from the behavioural finance perspective. Using 132 samples of new issues listed on the main board from 1991 to 2003, the new listing market has been accessed using four behavioural finance theories; divergence of opinion, representative heuristics, disposition effect and noise trading theories. Findings reveal an average initial underpricing of 66.51 % and a long-run performance which is almost at par with the market return when both equally-weighted and value-weighted returns are calculated. Furthermore, it is found that proxies for divergence of opinion and representative heuristics have significant predictive power over short-run return of new listings. The imposition of moratorium is found to have no moderating effect over the relationship between proxies of divergence of opinion and short-run return. Nevertheless, no explanatory power is found between proxies of divergence of opinion and long-run return of the new listings. It seems that investors' valuation system falls back to fundamental such as operating history after a lapse of time. Meanwhile, empirical test results also prove that the behaviour of flipping and holding new issues of the new listing investors is significantly subject to disposition effect. Assessments of the new listings' ex-post performance show that the motivation to flip winners due to the fear that winners will become losers in the ex-post is justifiable while the motivation to hold on to losers due to the belief that losers will perform significantly better in the ex-post is unjustifiable. Besides, the motivation of holding the losers due to anticipation of a mean revert, whereby losers will perform better than winners in the ex-post is proven to be an erroneous belief. Finally, analyses on the explanatory power of ex-ante factors and noise trading proxy on immediate aftermarket behaviours show that the behaviours of the new listing investors are Significantly affected by noise. On the other hand, fundamental variables proxied using ex-ante factors such as operating history, subscription ratio and crisis dummy are found to have no significant explanatory power over immediate aftermarket behaviour. Generally, based upon the findings, this study concludes that the aftermarket behaviours of the Malaysian new listing investors are irrational and resemble that of an emerging market whereby majority of the investors are individuals who are not- wellinformed. Moreover, these behavioural drawbacks are able to explain the short-run anomaly in the new listing market significantly
Description
Keywords
Divergence Of Opinion, Representative Heuristics, Disposition Effect And Noise Trading , In The Malaysian New Listings Market
Citation