The Fundamental Arguments For Moral Judgement In Historiography: A Philosophical Analysis

dc.contributor.author	Mohammad Umair Abd Rahim
dc.date.accessioned	2022-04-13T07:48:40Z
dc.date.available	2022-04-13T07:48:40Z
dc.date.issued	2020-11
dc.description.abstract	Moral judgement is one of many practice or method of historians in writing history. A philosophical attitude in perceiving the practice of moral judgement in historiography is by questioning the validity of this practice in historical method; whether it should be adopted by historians or not. In light of this, historians since the Early Modern Age have laid down arguments challenging the intellectual foundation of the practice of moral judgement in historiography. Departing from the previous era of Western historiography, the Rankean method which disavowed moral judgement in historiography had become the mainstream historical method. Notwithstanding, not few historians have stood up to defend the practice of moral judgement in historiography with intellectual arguments and justifications.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15122
dc.publisher	Universiti Sains Malaysia	en_US
dc.subject	The Fundamental Arguments For Moral	en_US
dc.subject	Judgement In Historiography: A Philosophical Analysis	en_US
dc.title	The Fundamental Arguments For Moral Judgement In Historiography: A Philosophical Analysis	en_US
dc.type	Thesis	en_US

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1